Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
cjlasky7: (Default)
No.

At first, I couldn't believe what I was reading. It had to be a sick internet joke. But no--it was all too real. My last sustained memory of MT was the final episode of BUFFY and she was still a child. Now, she's dead before the age of 40, supposedly due to... natural causes.

"Natural"?! Dying at 39 is not natural.

As a BUFFY fan (and as a moderately empathetic human being) this was all upsetting enough. But then you dig into the reports about her life as a child actor, how she was abused by her schoolmates as "that girl on TV" during her pre-teen years and you wonder if the Hollywood that brought her fame and wealth also destroyed her health. And as a BUFFY fan, you are also forced to remember the horrifying rule on the set of BtVS:

Never, NEVER leave Michelle alone with Joss Whedon.

The reason behind that rule has never been made public, and until one of the cast breaks the silence, we can only speculate. But it's not speculation that her self image took a battering on that set. It's a chilling reminder that the Hollywood Dream Factory is, at its core, a factory. And factories often do not care who gets caught up in the gears.
cjlasky7: (Default)
Eagles 40, Chiefs 22

Trust me, the final score doesn't reflect how one-sided this game turned out to be. It was over halfway through the third quarter and Eagle backups played a good chunk of the fourth. It was embarrassing.

Nobody expected this. These are the Chiefs and this is Patrick Mahomes. They don't get manhandled. They don't ever lose control of a game. If they're down, they always find a way to adapt and come back strong. But there were no comebacks here.

In retrospect, you could see the iceberg looming on the port bow. There were nagging questions about this Kansas City team, warning signs obscured by their incredible string (12!) of razor thin victories. They had no running game. Their best wide receiver was out for the season. Travis Kelce looked like he'd lost a step. (Well, maybe not off the field....) The offensive line looked a liitle shaky. Still, the Chiefs went 17-1 in the regular season. It was all going to work out for them, the way it always does.

Not this time. The Eagles sacked Mahomes six times, and their front four blew through the KC offensive line like it was tissue paper. (And it was just those four guys! The Eagles didn't blitz once! Incredible!) Running in spirals to avoid the rush, Mahomes looked like a wounded osprey fluttering in the wind. Commentators dinged Mahomes for his performance, but he had no time to throw, to THINK! There were times when it looked like the Eagles were in the backfield with him right at the snap.

(And even when he did get those few precious seconds to throw, his receivers--Worthy, Brown, and yes, Kelce--could never separate from the Eagle secondary.)

On the other side of the ball, the KC defense shut down Saquon Barkley, an admirable feat. But that just left empty space for A.J. Brown and Devonta Smith to roam free. And even when the Chiefs locked down Barkley and the wide receivers, Jalen Hurts had plenty of room to run. Philly had too many weapons operating at peak capacity.

In short, a total humiliation on an international stage. (And if you think Drake feels bad, imagine how the Chiefs must feel....)

******************

I've read many comments on the proposed Buffy revival/reboot/sequel, and they seem to be split between "I'm so excited!" and "It'll never live up to the original."

I'd like to hit this from another angle.

Once upon a time, there was a TV series that broke the mold, a fresh and exciting idea that saw the universe from a different perspective, a series that galvanized a generation of young fans. The series creator was something of a problematic personality, someone who never quite lived up to the ideals of his creation; but with the help of his often underappreciated staff, his series earned a permanent place in American popular culture.

That series? Star Trek.

When Star Trek: the Next Generation debuted in 1987, many people doubted that it would ever match the popularity and influence of the original. But, after a bumpy beginning, TNG equalled and perhaps surpassed the original. The key was staying true to Roddenberry's idealism, that the spirit of cooperation and the hunger for knowledge and understanding would elevate humanity from its worst instincts. All the best Trek series--each reflecting its era--have stayed true to this principle.

Similarly, BtVS centers around another powerful idea: that the myths and tropes of horror movies are potent metaphors for the horrors in everyday life; and that in facing down these supernatural terrors, we can metaphorically conquer those everyday trials as well. Whatever you might think of Joss Whedon, the IDEA is still valid. If you get the right people working in the right spirit, a new Buffy could be magical in its own right.

Would I like to see Petrie or Espenson or Drew Goddard chip in on the writing? Sure. Would I like to see Giles or Willow drop in and say hi (the way Spock and Scotty did on TNG)? Of course. But none of that is essential. Stay true to the essence and make it relevant to now.

It'll be tricky...but it's been done before.
cjlasky7: (Default)
Happy holidays everybody!

Three very different, very entertaining and/or thought provoking pop culture nuggets for your perusal:

American Fiction (written for the screen and directed by Cord Jefferson)

I have to give it up to the screenwriter/director. Given the premise--"serious" novelist pens sterotypical ghetto tragedy potboiler as a joke and winds up with runaway best seller--this could have been a wild, uninhibited farce with our protagonist squeezed into ever more embarrassing situations and parodic scenes from the novel filling up the movie.

But Jefferson does something interesting: yes, some of the farcical elements are here, as Monk (Jeffrey Wright) slams head first into a white-dominated media world that only seems interested in black suffering. But he deliberately undercuts the farce with more grounded scenes with Monk as he deals with his troubled family and his own conflicted self-image.

As a result, the movie is less about white liberal hypocrisy or even black family life, and more about Monk's growth as a character; how his serious novels (based on updates of Ancient Greek drama) and his elitist views of literature reflect his own detachment from the forces that shaped him, and how his "joke" novel allows some of those conflicts to seep out.

The movie never settles into easy answers to Monk's issues. There are no pat resolutions to the family drama--and even the "sellout" author who provokes his vicious parody (played beautifully by Issa Rae) is given the chance to state her case.

Some critics wanted a more caustic satire, more like the original novel or in the vein of Spike Lee's Bamboozled. But Jefferson isn't as didactic as Lee. Character comes first--and in that, he has the perfect partner in Jeffrey Wright. I think Wright is one of the best actors on the planet and this movie has done nothing to change my opinion. Thelonious "Monk" Ellison could have been an abstraction; Wright makes this very difficult character feel real and he holds the center of the movie.


Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special (written and directed by James Gunn)

As I am not blessed with a Disney+ subscription, I missed out on this seasonal treat a few years ago; so I was delighted when FX picked it up for holiday viewing.

A GotG Xmas special sounds weird, but fans of the franchise know this is right up James Gunn's alley: an absolutely sincere tribute to the cheeseball Xmas specials of holidays past, with just enough of an acknowledgement of their absurdities.

Wedged in between the second and third GotG movies, the plot is simple: Peter Quill (Chris Pratt) is depressed, and Mantis (Pom Klementieff) wants to cheer him up with a present for that strange Earth holiday called Christmas. But what to get him? Drax (Dave Bautista) has the perfect gift idea: why not bring Quill that great warrior he keeps blabbering about...

Kevin Bacon?

So Drax and Mantis warp down to Earth and kidnap Kevin Bacon.

Yeah, it's every bit as ridiculous as it sounds, but Gunn fires off some great comic riffs as Drax and Mantis bounce across Los Angeles like a pair of demented Christmas elves, photobombing the tourists, partying at the club, and terrifying poor Kevin Bacon (who just wants to sit quietly at home until Kyra Sedgwick and the kids come back from New York).

But once the silliness subsides and Kevin chills out, Gunn flips over to the sentimental side of these specials and it fits nicely into Guardians lore: Drax tells Kevin that Footloose inspired the Starlord dance moves that saved the galaxy; and Mantis gives Quill the best Christmas present of all--the sister he never knew he had.

It's not an all-time classic, but it goes down pretty smooth, and for devoted Marvel maniacs, it's an essential piece of the GotG story. (I will say, tbough, that the, um, unusual take on the legend of Santa Claus by the alien rock and roll band should be a perennial.)


Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl (co-written and co-directed by Nick Park)

For a Wallace and Gromit fan, there is a feeling of happiness and reassurance from a simple trumpet fanfare. That familiar theme music tells you that you are back in the Claymation world of Nick Park and Aardman animation and you are safely in the hands of a master.

Vengeance Most Fowl is the first W&G movie in nineteen years, but Park and his team haven't missed a step. In fact, the backgrounds seem to be packed with more detail than ever before; the gags are even more exquisitely timed; and the supporting characters are better than ever in adding depth to Wallace and Gromit's world.

Thankfully, Wallace and Gromit themselves haven't changed at all. Wallace is still the model of dotty, kind hearted British eccentricity, tinkering with his gears and tubes and springs to the silent exasperation of Gromit, his ever loyal canine companion. (Ben Whitehead, taking over the voice of Wallace from the late Peter Sallis, is nearly flawless.) One of Wallace's inventions goes awry/falls into the wrong hands and Gromit has to dig in his paws and save the day.

The big improvement over the previous W&G movie is the return of the series' greatest villain: Feathers McGraw, the silent, beady-eyed penguin mastermind from The Wrong Trousers. One of the pleasures of the movie is watching McGraw's machinations slowly unfold. His plan to escape his prison (the local zoo, of course), get revenge on Wallace and Gromit, and complete his final theft is almost as detailed as the animation itself.

I could spend another ten paragraphs listing the great gags in this movie, from the terrifying antics of Wallace's automated garden gnome to the climactic barge "race"; but you should just see it for yourself. (Vengeance Most Fowl is in limited release in movie theaters, and debuts on Netflix in early January.)
cjlasky7: (Default)
BEAT (Adrian Belew, Tony Levin, Steve Vai, Danny Carey) Live at Kings Theater in Brooklyn 12/8/24

A bit of history first....

When King Crimson founder/lead guitarist/benevolent dictator Robert Fripp reconstituted the band in 1981, it was a fairly radical departure from previous incarnations. This was a progressive rock dinosaur surprisingly light on its feet, incorporating new wave rock and Indonesian gamelan music into Crimson's already heady mixture of classical and jazz motifs.

Along with long time drummer Bill Bruford, Fripp recruited guitarist Adrian Belew (whom he met while recording for David Bowie in Berlin) and ace bass player Tony Levin (snatched away from Peter Gabriel). Belew brought his guitar menagerie of roars, squeaks and squawks into the mix and his David Byrne-like yawp and surrealistic lyrics gave the oft-ignored singer/front man of the group an actual personality. (Often said, sadly true: nobody comes to King Crimson concerts to see the singer.)

This version of the band stayed together for three whole albums (a KC record!)--Discipline, Beat and Three of a Perfect Pair--and Belew fronted the group in the 90s and 00s long after Levin and Bruford had departed....

...which is why it came as a shock to Adrian when Fripp called him up in 2013 and told him his services were no longer required. Belew couldn't believe it. Fired? (Wasn't Crimson his band, too?)

But Fripp has been the guiding force and taskmaster behind King Crimson since its birth in 1969, and he has left a slew of talented musicians on the side of the road. And if Robert thinks it's time to move on....he moves on. Crimson toured in the 2010s with a new lead singer, an emphasis on the 50-year breadth of its catalogue--but with very little of the 80s material. (I caught them in 2017; they were faaaaantastic!)

But with a wealth of quality songs sitting there gathering dust, Belew petitioned Fripp for permission to take the 80s material out on the road. Fripp gave his blessing. That left one major road block: who do you get to play this shit?

Tony Levin was in. (Beats session work.) But if Fripp and Bruford were out, that's a problem. Guitar players have spent YEARS trying and failing to duplicate Fripp's technique. Most rock drummers can barely keep a four on the floor beat; let's see them keep up if the meter is in...oh, 21. 80s Crimson is some of the most rhythmically complex, knottiest music out there. Amateurs need not apply.

This time, though, the gods smiled on Belew. He reeled in guitar virtuoso Steve Vai (a fellow survivor from Frank Zappa's band) and on drums, he scored a major coup with Danny Carey from Tool--perhaps the one band working today that can legitimately call themselves Crimson's successor.

So when Belew took center stage at the opulently refurbished Kings Theater on Sunday, he was like a man playing with house money. The joy was palpable. The band ripped through two hours plus of Belew era material, and one powerhouse ringer from 70s Crimson ("Red"). Belew and Vai easily duplicated the hypnotic, interlocking guitar riffs that were a trademark of those 80s albums, and Carrey nearly stole the show with cascading drum fills played at maximum force.

So was it really a King Crimson concert--only without Robert Fripp? Not quite. Vai took great pains (literal and figurative) to duplicate a lot of Fripp's punishing finger work, but there were spaces in the show that left openings for solos and experiments that Fripp wouldn't allow. An extended version of "The Sheltering Sky" broke out of its meditative groove for some patented Vai pyrotechnics; Belew and Carey locked in for a gorgeous duet on standing drum kits on "Waiting Man"; and Belew went off the reservation on "Industry", veering away from the piece's metallic grind into Pink Floyd-ian ambient noise.

But if I went to this show to hear anything, it was songs from that first 80s album, Discipline. To me, Discipline is the platonic idea of a King Crimson album. Most lyrics on a Crimson album come off as superfluous or annoying, because the point of King Crimson is the process of four brilliant individual artists creating the music. The music doesn't help convey an idea in the lyrics; the music IS the idea. Discipline gets around the problem because all the lyrics are about the process of creating the album. (It's hilariously, perfectly meta.)

So when the guys played "Elephant Talk," "Frame By Frame," "Indiscipline" (spectacular!), and "Thela Hun Ginjeet" to close out the show, I was a happy camper.

Come back soon, guys! (Maybe some 90s material next time?)

Checking In

Dec. 9th, 2024 07:22 pm
cjlasky7: (Default)
It's been seven months since my last post? Really? Wow.

I have no excuse for my absenteeism. Yes, I've been busy at work, preoccupied with my health and hip deep in various household projects, but that doesn't mean I couldn't spare a minute to say hi. I guess it comes down to: I don't think anybody would be intetested in the details of my banal, domesticated tickytack life. (Hell, I'm not interested in the details half the time.) But maybe that doesn't matter. Maybe I need to talk about my banal, domesticated, tickytack life with you guys so I don't live in the echo chamber inside my head.

So what's been happening?

My job is my job. No change there.

The one truly positive development is that I've lost 20 pounds! I've bern carrying that extra weight for a couple of decades, and it's probably been a contributing factor to my elevated blood pressure. I'm on statins to bring the BP down and I'm hoping that the combination of weight loss and medication will bring me down to normal.

(There has been no recurrence of my deep vein thrombosis. But I will be on medication for that forever.)

BTW, my wife has lost 65 pounds! (Makes me look like an amateur.) The stress on her back and her ankles has disappeared. We go on extended walks together almost every night. It's kind of romantic--if passing the taco truck outside our local Walgreens can be romantic.

The Boy is in good health. He's 15 now, in his sophomore year at his Catholic high school. His soccer team made it to the city finals again! And they lost. Again.

He is....a teenager. He's hanging with his buds rather than mom and dad. (My wife refuses to accept this development.) He barely squeezes out two words when we ask him a question. If not properly motivated, he will sleep until dusk. He subsists on Doritos, peanut butter, chicken nuggets and Subway sandwiches.

He is also struggling with certain school subjects, which is new to him. I sometimes worry if he can handle the stress of the honors program and I wonder if we're pushing him too hard...or not hard enough. He's taller than both of us now, but there's still a lot of the quiet little kid in there. I want to protect him, stop him from making the same mistakes I did. But I know he's going to make mistakes
no matter what I do.

What else? We finished renovating the basement--it's basically my wife's GirlCave(tm)--and we had the entire first floor painted. The paint job is so beautiful my wife doesn't want to re-hang the pictures that were on the wall. (I'm going to have to wait her out on that one.)

I've been watching a lot of movies on our DVR, but nothing I felt worthy of a post. (The last movie I saw in the theaters was Deadpool and Wolverine--a massive disappointment.) I'm not particularly excited by the current and upcoming slate of movies. When is the Fantastic Four movie out? May? July?

I did venture out of my cubbyhole for two concerts recently: ELO at MSG (my first time at the Garden in decades), and last night, Beat at Kings Theater in Brooklyn. Adrian Belew, Tony Levin, Steve Vai and Danny Carey (the drummer from Tool) playing the 1980s King Crimson songbook. Now that concert was worthy of a post! Let's see if I actually write it. (Watch this space.)

Until then, take care everybody.
cjlasky7: (Default)
Most of the people on my flist have been, at one time or another, BUFFY obsessives.

We pored over episodes like sacred texts, overidentified with the characters, wrote fanfic, and yes, felt a little hollow inside when it all ended.

I often thought about writing a novel about the experience, that passionate connection with an image on your TV screen that you and maybe a few select others in your life could understand.

But now I don't have to.

There's a movie.

Writer/director Jane Schoenbrun's "I Saw the TV Glow" is about that strange bond between viewer and video, and how the experience warps your personal reality. And if there's any doubt whatsoever that the fictional TV show in the movie is a Buffy analog...

Amber Benson has a cameo.

It's playing in select theaters in New York and LA before going into wide release on the 17th.

I'm tempted to pop down to the Angelika in Manhattan to check it out.

(But what if I find it a little TOO relatable?)
cjlasky7: (Default)
I am currently in a bit of a holding pattern. I'm done with antibiotics, but my endoscopy has been postponed until next month. I'll be done with blood thinners after Sunday morning, but I won't know if they worked on the clot until May 9th. I'm waiting for waterproofers to come in and give me an estimate on my basement, but that's still ten days away.

(My wife also had some vital tests postponed until early May. We are very annoyed.)

In the meantime, a brief pop culture review while I'm waiting....

*****************

Late Night with the Devil (written and directed by Cameron and Colin Cairnes) is a neat little horror movie, a mostly successful "found footage" film with a unique twist: with the exception of a brief documentary introduction, it takes place entirely within one episode of a late 1970s late night talk show.

The talk show in question is Night Owls, hosted by the affable Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian), who has been lagging behind Johnny Carson his entire career and is perpetually one step away from cancelation. In a desperate bid to boost ratings, Delroy turns his Halloween episode into a dive into the paranormal, featuring a 12 year old girl supposedly possessed by a demon.

The movie is most effective when it stays in its chosen lane and sticks to the confines of the talk show, with Delroy interacting with his sidekick, a psychic, and a Ricky Jay-like skeptic (played with bitchy flamboyance by Ian Bliss). The Cairnes subtly, incrementally ratchet up the tension, depending on their host to guide the action until the inevitable blood soaked finale.

And Dastmalchian, in the driver's seat for the first time in his career, delivers. He's made a living playing tragic weirdoes in the margins of big movies (Polka Dot Man anyone?), but he shows here that he's more than capable of handling a lead role. Throughout the movie, we wonder about Delroy's motives. Is he just interested in putting on a freak show for the rubes or does he have deeper motivations? Delroy never loses his show biz bonhomie, but Dastmalchian lets you see the struggles going on underneath. It's a finely tuned, engaging performance.

The movie is not perfect. There are "master tape" excerpts from the Night Owls studio during commercials and the camera is just a little too perfectly in place for key conversations. (It kind of breaks the illusion.) And in the hallucinatory final sequence, we find out that everything we thought we knew about Jack Delroy turns out to be... exactly what we thought. (It's not bad, but it's kind of anticlimactic.)

These flaws don't ruin the movie, though. It's a solid debut for the Cairnes, and it proves that Dastmalchian is ready for bigger things. He says he wants to play a vampire. Give this man some fangs!

[Late Night with the Devil is still in selected theaters and is currently streaming on Shudder.]
cjlasky7: (Default)
I hate taking pills. The idea of introducing potent chemicals into my body with the possibility of toxic side effects unnerves me. Taking multiple pills is even worse: who knows how the combination of drugs will affect my system?

So right now, I am not having a good time. Because I am taking nine pills daily.

Let me break it down for you:

Amoxicillin (antibiotic) - 2 pills, twice daily
Clarithromycin (antibiotic) - 1 pill, twice daily
Eliquis (blood thinner) - 1 pill, twice daily
Prilosec (acid blocker) - 1 pill daily

It's all (unfortunately) necessary, because I still need to wash out that blood clot, treat my ulcers and kill the bacterial infection nestled like a viper in my stomach. This is what I get for putting off a GI exam for fifteen years. Doesn't mean I have to like it. The antibiotics are screwing with my digestive system, and I have this chalky taste in my mouth that won't go away. But I just need to stick it out until next Friday; then I'm back down to the Eliquis.

(I have another endoscopy in six weeks to check out if the stomach medications worked. I hope that's the end of it.)

Nine pills. Last night, I wondered out loud if I needed one of those pill containers with a day of the week on each compartment. My wife glared at me: "You're not 100."

Time for my morning antibiotics. I'll be right back.....

*************************

Bleagh. That was awful.

Where was I?

Oh yes... Morbius!

My wife recorded it partly as a joke and partly as an exploration of bad cinema. Yes, we know it sucks, but why does it suck? We pulled out our notebooks in anticipation; and who knows?, I said, maybe the critics were wrong and it'll turn out to be a hidden gem!

Just kidding. No, it was pretty bad.

I don't want to go into too much detail.
You can read about the flaws in this movie in any internet review: the boilerplate script, the washed out characters, the unimaginative camera work and action scenes and the horrible (truly horrible) special effects. The movie isn't an all-time stinker, but it pounds you to death with its relentless mediocrity.

But thinking about it later, I had a realization: this movie was doomed from the get go.

The problem here is that Sony tried to create a Marvel level superhero movie on one-third of the Marvel budget. So you don't have the up and coming director, the quality screenwriter, the expert stunt coordinator and the top shelf FX studio. You spend the money on Jared Leto, but everything else looks and sounds like crap.

Could Morbius ever have been good? Hey, anything can be good, no matter how dumb the premise, if you put in the effort. Maybe they needed to scale things down a little, hone the screenplay, put more of an emphasis on practical effects, and hire an unknown as Morbius. The perfect example of this approach is (the Oscar-winning!) Godzilla Minus One; a franchise monster flick on a minimal budget, done with passion, strong characterization and visual flair.

I will give Morbius one thing though.

Matt Smith is having a ball. As the villain, he embraces his superpowerful vampiric state with wild enthusiasm. He struts, he poses, he dances in front of mirrors--he is groovin'. He almost makes the movie fun. (But not quite.)
cjlasky7: (Default)
Well, I put it off for as long as possible--fifteen years, as a matter of fact. But in the quest to discover the mysterious origins of my deep vein thrombosis, my doctor insisted it had to be done. So I finally gave in.

I had the colonoscopy.

(No really, the leg is doing much better now! Can't we just put it off for another fifteen years?)

I finally decided that I was being a scaredy cat and I needed to get an accurate assessment of my health for my family's sake (as well as my own). So I emptied out my gut and my colon smiled for the birdie.

The results? A few stray polyps (that my GI man didn't seem too worried about), but more seriously:

Ulcers.

This was kind of a surprise. I haven't had much of a problem with spicy foods; peppers don't bother me and I like my sushi with Wasabi. But, weirdly enough, I've had bad reactions to both AFTER the colonoscopy. (It's as if the procedure scraped off a protective coating around the ulcers...) I'm taking Prilosec for the next month, but I think I need to rethink my diet in general. That's not going to be easy.

***************

In between all the medical drama, I've caught up on some recent notable movies and TV miniseries and my reactions ranged from wild applause to total disgust (with a few milder opinions in between). Let's break it down:

The Good Stuff

I already raved about Oppenheimer in a previous post, so I'm not going to repeat myself. It won all the Oscars it deserved to win. Same goes for Poor Things (directed by Yorgos Lanthimos), a brilliant deconstruction of the Victorian mindset (which persists--in many ways--to the modern world). Emma Stone is amazing (of course), but she almost gets the movie stolen out from under her by Mark Ruffalo, as a would-be Bohemian cad who isn't nearly as free from his era's social conventions as he thinks he is. (It's just pure evil fun to watch as Bella's quest for personal liberation completely strips him of his self delusions, leaving him a gibbering wreck.)

The makeup, costuming and production design combine to create a thoroughly believable steampunk alternate late 1800s and Lanthimos handles this expanded pallette with confidence and flair. If I have one complaint about the movie--and maybe this is just me--it's that Bella's logical, empirical methodology creates a bit of an emotional distance between the audience and the character. You root for her (because, yes, she's that awesome), but you don't get a lot of warm moments with her. (You get one between Bella and the courtesan in the Paris brothel, but I would have liked a little more.)

Pay no attention to my nitpicking. This movie is great. And we have another Emma Stone/Yorgos Lanthimos team up all ready to go? I'm there!

I've heard descriptions of Beau Is Afraid (written and directed by Ari Aster) ranging from "technicolor nervous breakdown" to "the world's longest Jewish mother joke." I think the closest I can get to classifying this very bold, very long, very weird movie is the counterculture novels of Terry Southern (like Candy or The Magic Christian), where a naive protagonist would go on a surreal, satirical journey through modern society--a bildungsroman on acid. But since Aster is a horror director, this movie is more like an anti-bildungsroman--the deeper he goes, the more he realizes he's always been fucked.

Whether you're willing to sit through a three hour anxiety attack depends on whether you liked Ari Aster's previous movies (Heredity and Midsommar) and how much you like Joaquin Phoenix. But, love it or hate it, give Phoenix credit--the man commits. His Beau is a vibrating mass of jangled nerves, constantly on the verge of helpless tears or outright implosion. It's a version of Phoenix we've rarely seen before--softer, intensely vulnerable--and he capably guides us through Aster's narrative circus act until the bitter, bitter end.

Is this movie for everyone? No. A lot of people will give up halfway through, muttering "self indulgent crap". But I loved it. It was John Waters' favorite movie of last year. (Have we ever steered you wrong?)


Should Have Been Better

I've been a fan of Nicole Holofcener for awhile now, admiring her idiosyncratic romantic comedies, like Enough Said (starring Julia Louis Dreyfus and the late--sniff!--James Gandolfini) or her screenplays for The Last Duel and Can You Ever Forgive Me?

Holofcener's latest, You Hurt My Feelings, teams her up with JLD again, but the movie just isn't as sharp as their previous outing, and the central conflict--semi-famous author discovers husband doesn't like her novel--comes off as rich people's problems and relatively slight. There are mentions throughout the movie of the author's abusive childhood, but Holofcener doesn't put much emphasis on past trauma, perhaps afraid it'll spoil the warm, relaxed vibe.

The big problem with the movie, though, is that it's not very funny. It's witty and well-observed (as usual for a Holofcener joint), but the big laughs (mostly) aren't there. The exception is a series of riotous scenes with David Cross and Amber Tamblyn as a married couple receiving no help from their couples counseling sessions. Cross and Tamblyn (married in RL!) bounce acid comments off each other and their hapless therapist at breakneck speed and it supercharges the whole movie. Maybe next time, Holofcener needs to get a bit more down and dirty.

Feud: Capote and the Swans, detailing Truman Capote's friendship with--and ultimate betrayal of--the ladies of Manhattan society has an incredible pedigree: written by playwright Jon Robin Baitz, directed by Gus Van Sant, and stocked with a-list acting talent (led by Tom Hollander as Capote), it should have been a knockout...

But once the relationship between Capote and his "swans" has been defined--he's both attracted and repelled by the Lifestyles of the Superrich--the drama spins its wheels for the rest of the series. There are occasional breaks in the inertia-- Chris Chalk drops in as James Baldwin, dispensing gay solidarity and hard truths--but no amount of bon mots can disguise the tedium at the heart of the enterprise.

Naomi Watts is superb as practically perfect Babe Paley (wife of CBS chairman William Paley), and Hollander devours Capote like a fine pate de fois gras. I just wish they were in a better show.


Complete Botch

How could they have blown it this badly?

Scott Frank (The Queen's Gambit) and Tom Fontana (Homicide: Life on the Street) take Dashiel Hammett's Sam Spade (Clive Owen) on an adventure to the south of France, where he encounters beautiful scenery, beautiful women, spies, jaded gendarmes and lots and lots of murder. It can't miss.

So why is it so boring?

Frank and Fontana somehow, inexplicably, make every wrong choice. The most interesting characters, like Brigid O'Shaughnessy and Spade's rich and beautiful French wife, Gabrielle? Dead before the first commercial. The main villain, the Sydney Greenstreet of the piece? Lost in the shadows for most of the runtime. Brigid's annoying teenage daughter? Does not shut up.

There is murder at a convent AND a mysterious boy who could be a prophesied messiah AND teams of uninteresting spies working at cross purposes AND much hand-wringing about the French/Algerian war. (An endlessly fascinating topic for American audiences, I've heard.) It's so convoluted that Alfre Woodard shows up in the last 15 minutes(!) and basically tells everybody to go home.

Owen tries his best, but Monsieur Spade is a complete botch from beginning to end. Pray there is no Season Two.
cjlasky7: (Default)
1. Conventional wisdom said that Kansas City's defense would hold back the 49ers until Patrick Mahomes could rally the Chiefs offense. For once, conventional wisdom was right. The 49er offense disappeared for most of the second half, and if a game is close, you know (YOU KNOW) Mahomes will find a way to win it. The scramble on 4th and 1 in OT would be a career highlight for most players; for Mahomes, it's just...typical.

2. Kansas City's D-line didn't really stop McCaffrey--but then, nobody really stops McCaffrey. You just contain the damage. The real shut downs came from the KC cornerbacks, who smothered Aiyuk and Deebo. Purdy didn't even try to test L'Jarius Sneed. (I don't remember hearing his name at all.)

3. The most depressing part of KC's win (for the rest of the league, that is)? This is probably the worst team the Chiefs will put on the field for the next few years. That defense is one of the youngest in the NFL; they'll only improve with experience. And once the receiving corps dumps dead weight like Kadarius Toney (and the Chiefs draft another deep threat), Mahomes will be zinging the ball downfield again (like the old days with Tyreek Hill). Sorry, Buffalo.

4. All the celebrity ads were TERRIBLE. At least the "couch potato farm" ad for PlutoTV had a clever idea and actually had something to do with the product. Just like in the movies, you can have the biggest star in the world in front of the camera, but if the script sucks, you won't bring in customers.

5. Alicia Keys was wonderful. Loved the red jumpsuit and matching gown. (Wait...Usher was there too? I didn't notice.)

6. One half of the Travis Kelce/Taylor Swift power couple regaled the audience with covers of "Viva Las Vegas" and "Fight for Your Right to Party." Unfortunately, it was the wrong half.
cjlasky7: (Default)
"Wait...this came out in 2022. And you're just getting to it now? I thought you were this biiiig Doctor Strange fan!"

Well...I was busy. (Shut up.)

******************
Warning: spoilers and extreme nerdiness ahead.

This movie almost works. Almost. Everything you need in a Doctor Strange movie is in there (plus a bonus at the end, which I'll get to). But the movie is overstuffed, and the vital material gets swamped under by extraneous action scenes, distracting superhero cameos and dangling loose ends from other corners of the MCU.

BUT before I start kvetching, let me focus on what I loved about this movie: the character of Stephen Strange himself. Not his sooperwizard powers--the man, who he is and where he's going. After we finished the movie, I told my wife: "It's comforting to know that, throughout the multiverse, Stephen Strange will always be an asshole." And it IS comforting! It's consistency of character, from his debut in Strange Tales #110 to right now. He was an arrogant prick as a high priced neurosurgeon and he's STILL an arrogant prick as a wizard. (Only now he saves the world. And he doesn't run up your insurance bill.)

It amused me greatly to see Dr. Strange screaming at everyone that Wanda was coming to kill them all, and the other characters nodded politely and said: "Yes, that IS a problem. But let's talk about YOU, Stephen." Stephen Strange may be the hero of the movie, but to most of the characters in it, HE is the biggest threat to the multiverse. And they're right! At least two other Stranges have destroyed their realities by fatally overestimating their ability to control the forces they've unleashed. So what makes our version of Dr. Strange any different?

That's the central question holding the movie together. Has he grown at all, or at least enough to avoid those catastrophic displays of hubris? Can he finally let go of Christine Palmer and move on with his life? Maybe. He does bow to Wong, a show of deference and respect. He defends and then empowers America Chavez, who must remind him of the little sister he lost. And he finally fixes that damn watch. (Symbolism!) Is he a humble Master of the Mystic Arts and lover of puppies at the end? Don't be ridiculous.

You see? All good! But to get to that good stuff, you have to deal with the plot. And that means dealing with the Scarlet Witch.

Look, I don't really mind that Marvel used this movie to clean up the loose ends of WandaVision; if you're going to continue the story of a powerful sorceress, a Dr. Strange movie is a good fit. But why does it have to be another "Wanda Goes Batshit" plotline? Speaking as a long-suffering Marvel reader, haven't we had too many of those already? In WGB stories, Wanda often seems like a gigantic plot device rather than a legitimate character, setting huge events in motion with her chaos magic, because she's crazy powerful (emphasis on "crazy").

Same here. Why does Wanda have to go apocalyptically evil because her "children" were magical illusions? Isn't there a better path here? (I feel there are a few steps missing between "dealing with grief" and "murderous rampage.") And if you say "the Darkhold is warping her mind", then why does she snap out of it so quickly when her "kids" are scared of her? Shouldn't an infamous book of dark magic have a better hold on its victims?

[Side note: boy, Sam Raimi loves his books of dark magic, doesn't he?]

I think this whole plotline was handled better in Avengers 184-186, when Chthon (the demon who created the Darkhold) actually possessed Wanda and sent her on a rampage. That might have worked better here. (If you're interested, that story is reprinted in the "Nights of Wundagore" graphic novel. Vintage John Byrne artwork. Pick it up!) So even though I wouldn't say Wanda's story was "botched" ("clumsily handled" is more accurate), it still left me with a sour stomach and detracted from the good stuff listed above.

But if I was slightly down on the movie when the credits rolled, that post-credits scene picked me right up:

Clea!

Charlize Theron as Clea!

Hell yeah!

For those of you unfamiliar with the comics, Clea is the niece of his arch foe, the dread Dormammu, occasional Queen of the Dark Dimension, with power levels off the charts... and (sadly) Stephen's ex-wife. (Clea is a courageous superheroine in her own right, not to mention stunningly beautiful, but Stephen just "couldn't make it work." What an asshole.)

Clea is one of the last pieces of the Dr. Strange mythos to fall into place, and it is the perfect set up for the third movie in...2031?

I can't have it right now?

Kevin Feige did not think this through.
cjlasky7: (Default)
My f-list just let out a collective groan.

"Oh no. NOW what?"

Don't worry. It's not that bad.

My wife has some ligament damage in her left ankle (and scar tissue around it). She's getting it fixed up and cleaned out. She'll be home for a few weeks, but with rest and recuperation, she'll be as good as new.

Frankly, the way the school year has been going, I think she needs the break. She can nestle into her safe space in the basement and decompress. (I can play nurse and spoil her.)

I will update when she's settled in.
cjlasky7: (Default)
Medical update: went for my post-release follow up at the hospital. Swelling in the leg has gone down considerably (but the clot probably won't disappear completely for awhile). I'll be on blood thinning medication for about three months. Doctor ordered a barrage of tests to see if there's any possible underlying conditions behind the blood clot, so.... more needles! More blood work! Colonoscopy! Fun!

**********************

Fargo really hasn't been hitting on all cylinders since the peak of Season 2 (I covered s2 in one of my first Dreamwidth posts!). S3 had Ewan McGregor's flashy dual performance (but not much else), and s4 stranded a lot of great actors (yes, I'm including Chris Rock) in a plot that moved like a tractor in mud.

So Season 5 is something of a retrenchment, with series creator Noah Hawley leaving the mob wars behind, paring down the cast, and focusing on a sympathetic central protagonist (Juno Temple). It's a smart way to keep the audience engaged, and still allows for spectacular performances from supporting characters.

Hawley's main theme this time is DEBT, and most of the misery in this go 'round stems from characters who want to take their proverbial pound of flesh--one way or another. Leading the pack is Jon Hamm, who thoroughly inhabits Roy Tillman, a small town sheriff in North Dakota who has set himself up as the tin god of his own little kingdom. Roy sees himself as a Biblical patriarch tending his flock--but he is a monster, fueled by selfishness, hatred and spite. Roy is determined to reclaim his ex-wife (Temple), who escaped his clutches ten years ago--and has absolutely no intention of going back.

Temple's Dot is no helpless victim here; she looks like a little slip of a housewife with a stereotypical "Minnesota Nice" accent, but she is a tiger when cornered, beating back kidnap attempts with a breathtaking ferocity. She is assisted in her game of "keep away" (sort of) by various ineffectual law officers--and her mother-in-law, Lorraine Lyon (Jennifer Jason Leigh). Lorraine isn't really that much better than Roy; as the queen of a financial empire built on America's crushing middle class debt, she wields her power with something approaching cruelty, and lords it over her subjects with smug superiority. (Leigh based her accent here on William F. Buckley. That should tell you something.)

But Lorraine, cold hearted tyrant that she is, is eventually worn down by Dot's courage in the face of Roy's attacks, and her love for--and fierce protectiveness of--Wayne and Scotty (Lorraine's son and granddaughter). That sets Lorraine and Roy on a collision course, and the face-to-face confrontations between Leigh and Hamm are a blast. Roy tries to intimidate Lorraine with macho swagger, but Lorraine slices him off at the knees every time.

[BTW, Dave Foley does great work here as Lorraine's consigliere, a smooth operator with a cool-looking bone-colored eyepatch, who thinks he has all the angles covered (until--unfortunately--he doesn't).]

Drifting through the narrative like a fog coming off a Minnesota lake is Ole Munch (pronounced "Moonck"), one of those weird, quasi-supernatural characters you sometimes see in Coen Brother movies (like Javier Bardem in No Country for Old Men). Munch (Sam Spruell) starts off as one of Roy's thugs for hire, but then reveals himself as something much older and stranger, with a burden and a code of honor that dates back centuries(!). Munch's code of debts that must be repaid in blood is Lorraine and Roy's code boiled down to its primitive core...

So it's appropriate that, after all the big showy gun battles are done, the final confrontation is between Munch and Dot--over dinner and biscuits at the Lyon home. In both Fargo the movie and Fargo the series, the whole Minnesota Nice motif is something of a joke, a veneer of politeness disguising sinister motives (or just plain idiocy). But this scene--maybe my favorite of the whole series--suggests that maybe behind that veneer there is something deeper: a warmth and a generosity of spirit that can forgive even the oldest of debts.

Highly recommended. Come for Jon Hamm and Jennifer Jason Leigh. Stay for the biscuits.
cjlasky7: (Default)
NFC Playoffs: Buccaneers 32, Eagles 9

[howling laughter]

Wait, I'm sorry, that was just mean.

Even as a Giants fan, I should sympathize with the good people of Philadelphia, who had to watch in horror as their beloved Eagles--an unstoppable football machine until November--finished a complete collapse and were eliminated from the post-season. What did they do to deserve such torture?

[howling laughter]

Ah, they'll get over it.

It's been fun following the Eagles for the past seven weeks as they face planted against a parade of NFL mediocrities and also-rans (yes, including the Giants)--teams they should have been steamrolling into the turf. Their offense wasn't THAT bad, but the defense seemingly forgot how to tackle, cover receivers, and mutilate running backs. You know, the basics. (Seriously, give me the ball and I could get six or seven yards on the Eagle D-line right now.)

How could a team that reached the Super Bowl last year melt down so completely? That's for Philadelphia to sort out over the long, long off-season. As for me, nothing could give a more satisfying feeling of schadenfreude than watching the Eagles bomb in the first round of the playoffs...

NFC Playoffs: Packers 48, Cowboys 32

I stand corrected.
cjlasky7: (Default)
In case you haven't noticed, things have not been going well here at the old homestead.

The latest: on Friday night, my son slipped in the bathroom and banged his head on either the tile floor or the edge of the bathtub. We couldn't quite get an accurate account of events because he couldn't remember falling or momentarily passing out. Naturally, we freaked--and so, barely three days after I left the hospital, our family was back in the ER.

My wife took him down to Methodist Hospital's pediatric ER, which was the smart move. Hospitals make my son very uncomfortable--he was practically looking for exits when he visited my room--so the pediatric ER was a little less intense than your standard, chaotic ER. He was in and out in a few hours. He has a minor concussion; no medication required and no strenuous activity for two weeks.

So with D. on concussion protocol and me on my blood thinner meds (and suffering from a winter cold, too!), my wife has declared herself the healthiest person in the house--which, if you know her various health problems, is a simultaneously hilarious and depressing declaration.

At least the cat is okay.

But if you want to pinpoint when this bad luck streak REALLY started, I guess you have to go back to the end of September, when Brooklyn got hit with eight inches of rain. In the 16+ years we've owned this house, we never had any problems with the basement. But this time, it was too much rain for the structure to hold. No, it wasn't a full-on flood, but there was enough water damage to bring up the unpleasant possibility of mold.

It took weeks to renovate the basement, to waterproof it, repaint it and get the furnishings back to my wife's exact specifications. The basement has always been my wife's refuge, her safe space when she's overloaded with stress. (She's a New York City schoolteacher. She has a lot of stress.) The water damage shattered her illusion of safety; and, to be honest, it shattered mine, too. Now, every time it rains, I check the walls of the basement...just to be sure.

(We also had water dripping down from the upstairs bathroom that's cracked the dining room ceiling. But, frankly, we're too exhausted to deal with that now.)

To sum up: both the house and its occupants are not in the best of health right now. But we will persevere! I'll try to keep you updated...
cjlasky7: (Default)
When you're trapped in a hospital bed and hooked up to a heart monitor, you have plenty of time to watch movies on the little TV attached to your food table. I watched five(!) movies in between blood pressure measurements, blood extractions and little jaunts around the hallways with a physical therapist.

So here is my quintet of capsule reviews:

Elemental is Pixar writer/director Peter Sohn's tribute to his Korean immigrant parents; so I kinda hate to say that the whole "immigrant experience" aspect of the movie didn't hold my interest. We've seen the "daughter caught between heritage and her own path" done better in Moana; I found the Mom's old world superstitions more annoying than charming; and Ashba (the Dad) just seemed like a jerk. (I also thought the urban melting pot of Element City was a lesser version of Zootopia.)

The love story was okay, even though Wade was something of a... drip. (Sorry.) But I loved some of the visual flourishes: Wade taking Amber underwater to see the vivisteria; Wade literally starting the Wave at the stadium, and all the details in the family's shop. Not bad, but it didn't tug my heartstrings in the usual Pixar way. (All right--the father/daughter exchange of bows at end did get to me a little...)

Super Mario Brothers was a LOT better than the live-action disaster of a few decades back; animation is the perfect medium for Mario and Luigi's candy-colored video game universe and the script was just smart enough to give the various iconic characters room to stretch out and get laughs. Chris Pratt and Charlie Day were merely adequate as the brothers, but they had great backup from Seth Rogan as a peevish Donkey Kong, Fred Armisen as DK's cranky dad, Anya Taylor-Joy as a feisty Princess Peach and especially Jack Black as the lovesick supervillain. (His simple but passionate ode to PP might even get an Oscar nod!)

Even better: Dungeons and Dragons: Honor Among Thieves is an IP-driven movie perfectly disguised as an original fantasy adventure. If you didn't know the source material, you'd be impressed by the world building and the well-defined central characters. Not a dud performance in the bunch: Chris Pine as the world-weary thief with a heart of gold; Michelle Rodriguez as his loyal barbarian sidekick; Justice Smith as the second-rate wizard; and Hugh Grant, in yet another terrific turn as a thoroughly charming and despicable asshole. Witty yet heartfelt script, stuffed with references to the game; but really, you don't need to know D&D to enjoy this. (Needs a sequel!)

The Matrix: Resurrections isn't so much a new Matrix movie as a commentary on the Matrix phenomenon by one of its creators. (And if Lana Wachowski wants to comment on her great creation, who are we to call it "a footnote" or "derivative"?) The first part of the movie was fun meta hijinks, as video game genius Thomas Anderson (Keanu) was forced by corporate master Warner Brothers (heh) to consider programming a sequel to his best selling trilogy (guess). There was a hilarious brainstorming session at video game HQ, where truly awful sequel ideas and corporate buzzwords were thrown at an increasingly nauseous Keanu.

Once Thomas took the red pill again, though, it was pretty much standard Matrix gravity-defying, kung fu action. Jonathon Groff and Yahya Abdul-Mateen were fine as new incarnations of Agent Smith and Morpheus, and Neil Patrick Harris NPH-ed all over the place as Thomas' suspiciously reassuring therapist. But the meta stuff felt fresher to me, an attempt to give the Matrix a modern context in an age it sort of helped create. (Still...it was great seeing Carrie Anne Moss shake off her blue pill fantasy and kick ass as Trinity again.)

Finally, I think Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania got a bit of a raw deal from the critics. Is it perfect? No. But the relationships between parents and children (Hank/Janet and Hope, Scott and Cassie) were well served here and Jonathan Majors was a truly fearsome Kang. (Too bad he turned out to be a creep.) Could it have been a little less Star Wars-y? Sure. But who says these characters don't work in a more elaborate sci-fi context? Do we miss Michael Pena's Luis that much? (I don't.) Is developing the love story between Scott and Hope that important? (It's never worked for me.) So, yeah, even though this was wildly different from the first two movies, it had enough of what worked in those first two movies to be entertaining. JMO.
cjlasky7: (Default)
Happy New Year, everyone.

I am home now, taking a day to recuperate after a three-day stay in the hospital--an unnerving and unpleasant experience.

Why was I in the hospital?

Let's go back about a month.

The family and I were taking a walking tour of the Brooklyn Botanic Garden's annual light show. It's about an hour and fifteen minutes end to end, so you need to sit down and rest once in a while. But I wasn't sitting down. I was worked up (for a variety of reasons), so while my wife and kid sat down, I paced relentlessly. By the end of the tour, I felt something pull in my right leg; it was a severe muscle strain or a small tear in the calf muscle.

I was hobbled for a while and the leg was swollen. But I didn't think it was a big deal; I'd dealt with strains and tears before. You keep off the leg as best you can, elevate it, and take an ibuprofen for any occasional pain. And for the most part, it worked: the strain or tear or whatever healed, and I regained full mobility. But here's the thing:

The swelling never went down.

After the new year, it started to dawn on me that the muscle strain/tear/whatever might be covering another condition--water in the tissues (edema) or, worst case scenario, a blood clot. So this Saturday, I finally had an ultrasound to find out what was happening in there...

It's a blood clot. Deep vein thrombosis.

If you're not familiar with DVTs, they are a tricky, highly dangerous condition. Blood clots don't necessarily disable you and sometimes, they aren't even painful. But a clot can come loose from the leg and travel straight to the lungs or heart. It could be--potentially--fatal.

The advice from my doctors? Go to the hospital. NOW. So I did. I checked into the emergency room at NYU/Langone in Brooklyn. I spent a full day on a stretcher squashed against a nurse's station in the hallway. In that first stretch, I frankly had no idea how long I would be there. I had read or heard that sometimes, a hospital would keep you for weeks while they safely wore down the clot.

On Sunday, they gave me a proper room in the ER and started me on IV drips of saline solution and blood thinners. It severely limited my movements--not great when I had to go to the bathroom--but by Monday morning, I could feel the combination working. The swelling was going down. I was confident that I'd be released Monday afternoon, and put on pills on an outpatient basis.

But they threw me a curveball. Monday afternoon, I was transferred to a semi-private room upstairs. They attached me to a heart monitor. I wondered what the heck was going on: is my condition worse than I thought? Is my "short" hospital visit just beginning? (I was trying not to panic.)

Fortunately, my original assumption turned out to be right: I was started on 10 mg of Equilis and I was set to be released on Tuesday morning...

Then, the inevitable insurance foulup kept me just a little while longer. The hospital didn't have the right insurance information. My wife's ordinarily bulletproof insurance package didn't cover the drug. My wife had to race to a local pharmacy next to the hospital before they closed at six. (Six?! Who closes at six?! Walgreens closes at ten!)

Anyway, I got the pills I needed--no cost for the first month. I was released at 7pm, and we drove
through the rainstorm to finally, FINALLY arrive home.

Home. My couch. My bed. The cat (who apparently was looking for me out the window for days). I am so happy to be back.

I'm not out of danger, though. I need to take blood thinners for at least a month or two, to make sure the clot is gone completely (and doesn't come back). I have to be on guard for side effects and I can't cut myself, because (as one person put it) I would "bleed like a motherfucker."

On the plus side (trying to be optimistic here), my blood pressure and heart are pretty good for a guy my age. I saw a ton of movies in my semi-private room: Elemental, Matrix Resurrections, Super Mario Bros., Quantumania and Dungeons and Dragons. (Some of them were good!)

But mostly, I'm alive. And I'm home.
cjlasky7: (Default)
Recently, E! broadcast the first two seasons of Grace and Frankie, starring Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin. It's a emotional bombshell of a sitcom premise: after 40 years of marriage, Grace and Frankie's husbands announce they're leaving their wives--for each other. Season One deals with the immediate fallout of the announcement; Season Two has Grace and Frankie solidifying their friendship and trying to establish new lives on their own as "women of a certain age."

While this sort of domestic demolition could be mined for intense drama, this is a sitcom, and a sitcom co-created by Marta Kaufman (who co-created Friends). If you strip away the sensational premise, it's an odd couple comedy: tightly wound, super organized business spouse Grace (Fonda) rooming with aging hippie and shoot-from-the-hip free spirit Frankie (Tomlin). There's a little too much "save the orangutans" crunchy granola outrage from Frankie (met with too much eye rolling from Grace) and it tends to wear thin very quickly.

The couples' children are also caught in the backwash of the announcement--but only one child really stands out: June Diane Raphael is sharp and funny as Grace's daughter Brianna, who has inherited both her mother's company and her acerbic personality. (Raphael routinely steals scenes from her veteran co-stars.)

Now, the tricky question: do we buy the ex-husbands (Martin Sheen and Sam Waterston) as a couple? ("It's President Jed Bartlett and D.A. Jack McCoy--and this time, they're gay!") Waterston works hard to sand off his usual edge and establish Sol as a soft-hearted mess whose tendency to spare people's feelings screws everybody over. (In the end, if I squint my eyes, I think I can buy him as gay; I don't know if I buy him as Jewish.) Sheen, OTOH, doesn't seem to work hard at all; he lets Robert's characterization as an emotionally guarded SOB do the work for him. It's a valid acting choice, I guess, but it prevents him and Waterston from coming off as truly intimate.

Still, even with these flaws, this series stars Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin; when the scripts cut through the comedic boilerplate and dig into the drama, their extraordinary talent brings these characters to three dimensional life.

*******************

Meanwhile, back at the Federation....

CBS just aired the first two episodes of Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, a series based (mostly) on the unaired original Star Trek pilot, "The Cage." (It only took 55 years to go from pilot to series...)

The idea behind Strange New Worlds (SNW) is simple: the format of the original series (TOS) was hugely successful--so why mess with it? The Enterprise (NCC-1701--no bloody A, B, C or D) goes to a new planet every week. The crew is literally the best of humanity (and related species). You've got a ruggedly handsome captain, a brilliant half Vulcan science officer, and a gifted communications officer with the singing voice of an angel. How can you go wrong?

Oh, some adjustments need to made for that 55-year gap: the special effects need an upgrade; everyone on the bridge needs to be a fully developed character; there has to be some degree of serialization to hold the audience; and those antiquated attitudes of the 1960s need a refresh. But beyond that? It's all good.

Ethan Peck and Celia Gooding honor Leonard Nimoy and Nichelle Nichols with their versions of Spock and Uhura. (In fact, Gooding's Uhura gets more character development in one episode than Nichols got in the previous five decades!) But the big draw here is Anson Mount as James T. Kirk's predecessor, Christopher Pike. Pike is the total Trek captain package: he has Kirk's dry wit, Picard's diplomatic tact, Sisko's cooking skills and maybe the finest head of hair in Starfleet history. Add a ton of tragic foreshadowing, and he is a solid anchor for this leg of the franchise.

Do I have nitpicks? Oh, always! There are a number of plot developments here that I think play havoc with Trek continuity (but I'm a nerd, so just tell me to run along and post it on a fanboard). Rebecca Romijn seems strangely underutilized in these episodes as Pike's first officer. (I've heard that's a continuing problem...)

And... well.. if you're a discerning science fiction fan, you might be tempted to ask: is that all there is? Yes, SNW is warm, nostalgia-rich comfort food; but for a franchise that's supposed to go where no one has gone before, shouldn't they be aiming a little higher?

************************

Bonus review: Very Short Treks

To celebrate the 50th anniversary of Star Trek: The Animated Series (TAS), Paramount is releasing a series of tongue-in-cheek short shots done in the cheapo animation style (Filmation) of TAS. From what I've seen in the previews and the first episode, it is a loving and depressingly accurate recreation.

Episode 1: "Skin a Cat"

With the Enterprise under fire from all sides, Spock asks Kirk if there's any way out of this mess. Kirk smirks that there's more than one than one way to skin a cat. Naturally, this mortally offends M'Ress, the animated Enterprise's very feline bridge officer. This thin joke is repeated with variations for the next three minutes before veering off the road completely.

I'd call this bad Lower Decks, but Lower Decks, even at its worst, is never this lame. (Call it a bad SNL sketch.)

Not a good start.
cjlasky7: (Default)
When I get older
Losing my hair
Many years from now
Will you still be sending me a valentine
Birthday greetings, bottle of wine?


--McCartney

Today is my 64th birthday.

I am off from work today and tomorrow. Yes, because nobody should work on their birthday, but that's not the main reason. School is starting up again today, and this is both my son's first day of high school and my wife's first day back teaching fifth grade. We've been frantically working out our schedules for the upcoming weeks--coordinating soccer practices, bus pickups and scouting events. It's still a work in progress; I'm hoping that by the end of the month, we'll settle into something resembling a routine.

Right now, I'm home alone. (I'll pick up the boy around 11:45.) Normally, I'd be slightly melancholy at the thought of another year gone by and slipping into my elderly years. But that's not where my head is at today. There's simply too much going on for me to be depressed. I have to help my son navigate his high school years and (hopefully) put him on the path to a happy, healthy adulthood. I have to help my wife survive her last five years of teaching so she can walk away with her nerves intact. I am this close to finishing a new short story that would (technically) introduce a new superhero universe.

Is everything perfect? No, it never is. We have our problems. I want to see more of my sister, my niece and her family. My best friend of almost 50 years is drifting away from me.

Yes, I'm getting older. But for the most part, I feel like I've got a lot more to offer the world. I'm just getting started.

***********************

Let's change the subject.

Pop culture!

As the actor and writers' strikes drag on, the studios are scrambling to find content to fill the gaping holes in their schedules. On the one hand, that means a whole bunch of crappy reality and game shows; but on the other hand, it means some "exclusive" streaming content is filtering down to basic cable, youtube, and even the traditional networks.

Their desperation has been my gain; I just finished streaming Season 3 of Star Trek: Lower Decks on youtube. Lower Decks is not for everybody-- it's an animated Trek comedy, extremely meta, and blindingly fast paced. The dialogue can come off as glib, and sometimes, the show fails to find the balance between parodying the absurdities of the Trek universe and seriously building the characters. But when it does hit that balance? The show is great. I sniffled a bit when the crew of the Cerritos visited Deep Space Nine (Kira! Quark! MORN!), but my favorite ep of the season was "Crisis Point 2: Paradoxus"--a rip roaring salute/parody of Trek movie sequels that also explored Boimler's existential crisis and Tendi's career ambitions. I loved the running debate among the ensigns whether their holodeck programs (read: the Trek movies) should be pure action/adventure or deal with deeper, philosophical issues. All this, and George Takei too? Great stuff.

Meanwhile, over on the Disney side of the tube, ABC broadcast the entire first season of Ms. Marvel to set up the big movie crossover ("The Marvels") in November. I love Kamala Khan in the comics and Iman Vellani is a perfect fit for the character. (She is absolutely adorable.) But, to be honest, I found the superhero action completely forgettable. The villains of the season (the Clandestine) were one dimensional and Kamala's wounded puppy love interest was a stiff. (Bruno has nothing to worry about... but the boy really, REALLY needs to tell Kamala how he feels.) What I found interesting were the insights into Muslim family life in America. (I could watch a whole episode of Nakia arguing with the mosque board about upgrading the women's section.) Unfortunately, I think The Marvels will concentrate more on wacky space action than the Khan family. And while I do want to see Kamala spazz out over meeting her idol, I don't know if that's enough to sustain a whole movie....

Oops. Gotta go. I'll pick this up later.
cjlasky7: (Default)
II. Barbie: (Not in the) Original Packaging

I am not a "doll" guy. I didn't play with dolls when I was--excuse me... I didn't play with action figures when I was a kid. No G.I. Joes or Major Matt Masons; my thing was comic books, which consumed most of my imagination and limited budget.

So I didn't go into the theater as a Barbie stan; I couldn't geek out over the dreamhouse designs or accessories or the Barbie camper van (which did look adorable, actually). I was there mostly as a Greta Gerwig fan; after Lady Bird and her update of Little Women, I wanted to see if she had the teeth to rip into a satire of a pop culture landmark.

The movie delivered... but it took awhile.

After the 2001 "dawn of time" parody (which, sadly, was overexposed on the internet), the movie opens in Barbieland, where Stereotypical Barbie (a luminous Margot Robbie) begins her perfect day (which is like every other day). Even for a Barbie novice--who couldn't time stamp a dream house design if his life depended on it--the set design was eye popping, the kind of technicolor playground you found in great 1950s musicals.

Stereotypical Barbie (let's call her Barbie Prime) greets her fellow Barbies, a breathtakingly diverse sampling of empowered womanhood--including Issa Rae as President Barbie (hell yeah!). But even though the Barbies are all shapes, sizes, colors and occupations, they all seem a little... plastic. Granted, this is a conscious decision by Gerwig; the Barbies are meant to be empty vessels, to be animated by the fantasies of their human owners. But it hurts the movie that none of the other Barbies--with the notable exception of Kate McKinnon's Weird Barbie--ever develop an interesting personality. (In contrast, the Lego Movie was filled to the brim with weird, funny and memorable supporting characters.)

Anyway, Barbie Prime suddenly suffers a horrifying existential crisis (complete with cellulite!), and journeys to the Real World to find out what's bothering her human owner. Ken Prime (Ryan Gosling) tags along, of course, because--designed solely for the female gaze--he tends to fade into the background whenever Barbie Prime's attention is elsewhere. This is where things start to get interesting. Barbie tracks down who she thinks is her owner: Sasha (Ariana Greenblatt), a sullen teenager who unloads on Barbie all the negatives feminists have associated with Barbie for years: unrealistic body images, unattainable perfection, and just plain making girls "feel bad about themselves." She caps it off by calling Barbie a "fascist," which hurts and confuses Barbie. ("But I don't even control the means of production!")

No, she doesn't. Men do. And while Barbie is dealing with her personal crisis, Ken discovers the patriarchy--and he is delighted. He travels back to Barbieland and recreates it as a douchebro paradise (with a fetching horse motif), subjugating the other Barbies. Gosling is phenomenal here: dressed in a faux mink coat (opened to expose his abs) that perfectly offsets his peroxide coif, he playacts the part of the overconfident stud--he's both ridiculous and awesome at the same time. (His big solo number, "I'm Just Ken," is a brilliantly choreographed mini-musical in itself.)

But I don't want to short change Margot Robbie. Gosling has the more flamboyant role, but Robbie does excellent work detailing Barbie's character arc from a passive vessel for her owner's dreams to an independent, thinking being. She has great chemistry with her real human owner (played to a frazzled crisp by America Ferrara) and hilarious anti-chemistry with Ken. At the end, when she tells her mother/creator (Rhea Perlman) she wants to be a fully realized human being (with all the pain and problems that entails), the scene wouldn't hit as hard if Robbie hadn't taken us on that journey. (She also does some great physical comedy: in one scene, when Barbie sinks into despair, Robbie collapses to the ground exactly like a broken doll.)

So, to sum up: not quite living up to "masterpiece" status, but an explosion of visual imagination with some wildly funny sequences. (The toy commercial for Clinically Depressed Barbie is the best sketch Saturday Night Live never did.) Gerwig makes her points about the tightrope act of American womanhood while keeping the proceedings fast moving and light.

And, if nothing else, Gerwig does humanity a public service: after this movie, serenading with an acoustic guitar will no longer be a "surefire" seduction move.

Random notes:

-- Other than McKinnon, the best supporting character is Michael Cera's Allan. As a "friend of Ken", Allan is even more of a non-entity than the secondary Kens. But, paradoxically, his frustration with his insignificance gives him more personality than any other Ken.

-- Will Ferrell basically reprises his role from the LEGO Movie as the CEO of Mattel--but it doesn't work twice. He's too broad and goofy when he should be a little menacing. (Maybe Gerwig's corporate sponsor wouldn't let their CEO be an outright villain.)